What to Know for Wednesday, June 24th, 2026:

1: Medicare's AI-powered prior authorization pilot creating delays, errors, payment backlogs in 6 states — WISeR intended to stop fraud, but ensnaring patients in red tape

  • WISeR launched January 2026 in Oklahoma, Arizona, New Jersey, Ohio, Texas, Washington requiring AI-reviewed prior authorization for 13 medical services: Program announced June 2025, launched mid-January (unusually rapid for federal government) requiring preapproval for epidurals, kyphoplasty, skin substitutes, and other procedures — CMS promised 72-hour decisions, but reality shows 6-8 week payment delays — example: Oklahoma cattle farmer Bill Curry made 10-hour road trips for repeated appointments, some for paperwork; Arizona pain doctor Jerry Sobel unpaid for 9 epidurals as of May.

  • AI-driven errors and suspected "hallucinations" denying necessary care — University of Washington had 100 patients delayed for epidurals: Doctors report denials contradicting submitted medical records (one patient marked "lacks numbness" despite documentation four times stating no numbness) — denials sometimes overturned on appeal — patients forced to seek expensive alternative care while waiting; one patient went to hospital instead of back pain procedure — CMS vendors deny AI hallucinations occur but acknowledge large backlogs from January.

  • Program intended to prevent fraud (skin substitutes spending up 700%) but creating higher government costs through appeals and administrative burden: More rejections triggering more appeals — Medicare paying administrative contractors to handle appeal volume — shifting costs to patients/doctors through delays and inconvenience — doctors worry expansion inevitable if pilot shows savings — CMS says "no changes considered" for service list currently but "continues to assess."

2: Women receive $438/month less Social Security than men — 2032 benefit cuts would deepen poverty gap for 55% of beneficiaries

  • Gender pay gap carries into retirement: women average $1,760/month vs. men's $2,198 annually, losing $5,254/year: Women comprise 55% of Social Security recipients 62+ but receive substantially less due to 83-cent gender wage gap (women earn only 83% of men's full-time wages) — disparities driven by career interruptions for caregiving (counting as zeros in benefits calculation), part-time work, occupational segregation (teaching, nursing, child care pay less than male-dominated fields).

  • Older women at higher poverty risk — 2032 cuts would impact them most since already reliant on benefits: Poverty rate jumped to 16.2% for older women (2023-2024) vs. 13.5% for men — women 80+ have 21.0% poverty rate, single women 65+ have 21.4% (vs. 10.9% married) — Social Security lifted 11.4 million older women out of poverty in 2024 vs. 8.6 million men — National Women's Law Center: "policymakers must strengthen and expand — not weaken and cut — Social Security."

  • Social Security gender gap varies dramatically by state: DC smallest gap ($174/month difference), Utah largest (27% gap = $649/month difference): States with smallest gaps (DC, Hawaii, New York) have diverse service economies, federal employment, professional representation for women — states with largest gaps (Utah 27%, Louisiana 25.9%, Wyoming 23.89%) historically dominated by male industries (energy, mining, manufacturing boosting men's lifetime earnings) — closing gaps requires building retirement savings independent of Social Security.

3: Federal judge blocks 5 states from banning soda, candy purchases with SNAP — ruled USDA lacked authority for health-focused restrictions

  • Judge blocked Trump administration's MAHA initiative allowing Colorado, Iowa, Nebraska, Tennessee, West Virginia to restrict food stamp purchases: U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson ruled USDA lacked authority to approve state waivers for pilot projects banning sugary drinks and candy — major setback for Health & Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s "Make America Healthy Again" movement focused on reducing ultraprocessed foods to combat obesity and diabetes — Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins had granted waiver requests from nearly two dozen states, though not all bans implemented yet.

  • States sought to restrict soda, energy drinks, and candy with no exceptions for all SNAP recipients: Five states had different bans but all limited sugary drinks — some also restricted candy — restrictions applied universally to all beneficiaries with no exceptions allowed — five SNAP recipients who sued argued they needed restricted items for health: some drinks necessary for Type 1 diabetes, kidney issues, lack of energy.

  • Judge ruled SNAP pilot authority allows testing efficiency, not imposing dietary restrictions — administration vows to continue fighting: Jackson wrote "federal defendants and states cannot violate law and their own regulations" despite "genuine desire to improve health" — SNAP pilot authority doesn't include improving health/diet of recipients — Rollins posted vow to continue MAHA fight, calling restriction "commonsense" and opposing "taxpayers subsidiz[ing] junk food," but legal challenge succeeded on procedural/jurisdictional grounds.

Here’s What You Missed on YouTube:

Check out our new YouTube videos for Wednesday, June 24th.

July 2026 Social Security: Your Payment Dates + Why Some Get Two Checks

This newsletter is for information only. Always confirm your options directly with Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, or a qualified advisor before making big decisions about your benefits.

Keep Reading